Author summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Spears results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 756 hits . Analysis detected 4,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,033 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,959 of 6,366 authors). This Rachel Spears is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Rachel Spears
Author details
Total words: 6,033
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst