Publication summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,001 hits . Analysis detected 5,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source Publication details
Total words: 7,560
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst