Author summary
13%5 analyzed articles/videos937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yonat Shimron results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 836 hits. Analysis detected 6,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,650 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,618 of 6,194 authors). This Yonat Shimron is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Yonat Shimron
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
10%Yonat Shimron (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,650
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate