Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These WPSU results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,989 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This WPSU is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,989
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst