Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Utah Public Radio results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,061 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Utah Public Radio is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Utah Public Radio
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%Capital B News1%
1%Spotlight Delaware1%
1%The Banner1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Utah Public Radio (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 2,061
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Publication 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos