Author summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pien Huang results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 5,144 hits . Analysis detected 21,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,910 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,895 of 6,215 authors). This Pien Huang is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Pien Huang
Author details
Total words: 25,910
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst