Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Stein results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 2,341 hits. Analysis detected 17,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,356 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,376 of 6,448 authors). This Rob Stein is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Rob Stein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠64%Rob Stein (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,356
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.9%18.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos