NPR84%

Vaccine advisers to the FDA recommended changes to COVID vaccines83%

By Rob Stein0%

5/22/2025, 8:49:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 651 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,736 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the article peer group.

The companies that make COVID-19 vaccines should update the shots again to target a variant closer to the strains currently on the rise, a committee of independent advisers to the Food and Drug Administration unanimously recommended Thursday. 
Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech and Novavax should target strains related to the JN.1 variant with their vaccines for next fall and winter because that strain is closer to the new variants of the virus that are circulating, the advisers voted after a day-long meeting. 
The recommendation came after the companies presented data that shows that vaccines based on viruses related to JN.1 strains produce strong protection against the latest versions of the virus, such as LP.8.1, which has become dominant in the U.S. 
The current Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech's mRNA vaccines target the KP.2 strain. 
Novavax's shot targets a JN.1 strain. 
The committee was uncertain about which particular JN.1 subvariant would be the best pick because it isn't known which strain may be dominant by the fall. 
The FDA will now work with the companies to make a final decision, officials said. 
The advisory panel's vote is consistent with the World Health Organization's recommendation for the next set of vaccines. 
The decision underscores the state of the evolution of the virus, which has now essentially become endemic in the U.S. and other countries. 
The virus continues to produce new subvariants of omicron instead of evolving into dramatically different strains that would pose a greater risk. 
Changes in the FDA approval process 
The recommendation comes two days after the FDA announced a new approach to COVID vaccines that would likely restrict access to the shots. 
While many questions remain about the new strategy, a change in strains would not appear to make a difference in how the FDA approves the next vaccines. 
The new strategy would continue the current vaccine approval process for people ages 65 and older and younger people with health problems that put them at high risk for serious complications from the virus. 
Those health problems include obesity, heart disease, cancer, inactivity and other risk factors. 
That regulatory approach relies on information about how the immune system responds to the vaccines. 
But the FDA will now require vaccine manufacturers to conduct large, costly additional studies to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines for children and younger healthy adults by comparing them to a harmless injection of saline. 
Those trials would look at differences in health outcomes, such as developing COVID. 
That's a major change from the current approach, which recommends and approves the vaccines for almost everyone based on the more easily obtained immune system studies. 
FDA officials say the change was prompted by the widespread immunity to the virus that people have developed because of repeated infections and vaccinations. 
This acquired immunity has contributed to a significant drop in serious illness and death from COVID. 
The FDA estimates 100 million to 200 million Americans would be eligible for COVID vaccines under the new approach. 
Some independent experts are welcoming the change. 
Others, however, worry the move would make it harder for many people who still want the vaccine to get it. 
That would include parents who want to vaccinate very young children and those who want to reduce their risk for mild or moderate illness, long COVID and the risk of spreading the virus to other people, such as older relatives. 
FDA officials say the steps will bring the U.S. in line with the approach that other high-income countries take towards the vaccines and are necessary to restore trust in the vaccines. 
Even though COVID is still claiming more lives than the flu, most U.S. adults have declined to get vaccinated against COVID in recent years and even fewer parents have opted to vaccinate their children. 
Children tend to be far less likely to get seriously ill from COVID, but the disease can still be serious for them, especially very young children. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Rob Stein: 4.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Rob Stein: 6.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 26.7%Rob Stein: 18.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect26.7%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Rob Stein: 2.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 5.8%Rob Stein: 6.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 11.8%Rob Stein: 15.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias11.8%This article: 9.5%Rob Stein: 2.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Rob Stein: 5.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 5.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 18.1%Rob Stein: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias18.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Rob Stein: 6.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 3.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 24.0%Rob Stein: 14.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority24.0%This article: 6.1%Rob Stein: 11.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 13.2%Rob Stein: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon13.2%This article: 4.8%Rob Stein: 3.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question4.8%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.0%Rob Stein: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground4.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.5%Rob Stein: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 5.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Stein: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%

651 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.