Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carmel Wroth results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,316 hits . Analysis detected 9,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,602 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,801 of 6,628 authors). This Carmel Wroth is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Carmel Wroth
Author details
Total words: 10,602
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst