Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These KRCU Public Radio results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 997 hits . Analysis detected 2,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This KRCU Public Radio is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,711
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 26.9% 26.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 26.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst