Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These KLCC results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 872 hits. Analysis detected 2,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,735 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This KLCC is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
KLCC
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%KLCC (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 3,735
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 23.4%23.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 23.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos