Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These WKNO FM results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 866 hits . Analysis detected 2,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 386 publications). This WKNO FM is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,726
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 23.2% 23.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 23.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst