Cyclosporiasis cases in the US hit record high 56%

By Alice Callahan85% Caroline Hopkins Legaspi85%

7/22/2026, 5:24:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 647 faulty-reasoning hits from 322 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,746 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the article peer group.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced on Tuesday that it had confirmed more than 2,500 additional cases of cyclospora infections in the United States, making 2026 the worst year for the parasitic infection on record. 
Since May 1, there have been 4,173 confirmed domestic cases across 41 states, as well as 767 people who were infected during international travel. 
The CDC is investigating more than 7,400 additional cases that are not yet confirmed. 
No deaths have been reported, and 308 people have been hospitalized. 
The previous record for confirmed cases was in 2019, when there were 4,703 domestic and internationally acquired infections over the course of the year; the CDC has reported an average of about 2,800 cases per year since 2016. 
Health officials are still investigating what’s behind the recent spate of illnesses caused by cyclospora, a parasite transmitted through contaminated food and water. 
There are likely multiple sources, they say, but they have linked one outbreak of at least 1,644 cases in Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia, Indiana and Kentucky to shredded iceberg lettuce sold by Taylor Farms and grown in central Mexico. 
Health experts say that the actual number of infections is likely higher. 
Many people with cyclospora never get tested. 
And because it takes time for states to report cases to the CDC and for the agency to confirm them, state case counts have often exceeded those reported at the federal level. 
The New York Times reached out to state health departments for their case counts, which collectively exceed 11,000 infections. 
On Friday, Taylor Farms initiated a recall of a variety of packaged products containing iceberg lettuce across 27 states. 
The company did not clarify how people could tell whether they had bought the contaminated product. 
And federal health experts have said that other foods could still be implicated. 
<i>This article originally appeared in </i><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/21/well/cyclospora-cases-record-cdc.html"><i>The New York Times</i></a><i>.</i> 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.1%Alice Callahan: 4.0%Boston Globe: 3.0%Confirmation Bias12.1%This article: 19.3%Alice Callahan: 10.4%Boston Globe: 0.8%Anchoring Bias19.3%This article: 9.6%Alice Callahan: 8.7%Boston Globe: 3.3%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 2.2%Alice Callahan: 0.7%Boston Globe: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 5.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.9%Alice Callahan: 2.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Alice Callahan: 1.1%Boston Globe: 2.0%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 11.2%Alice Callahan: 6.3%Boston Globe: 1.3%Pessimism Bias11.2%This article: 18.9%Alice Callahan: 14.6%Boston Globe: 7.9%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Alice Callahan: 4.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias12.1%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 23.3%Alice Callahan: 7.8%Boston Globe: 1.4%Recency Bias23.3%This article: 5.9%Alice Callahan: 2.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.5%Alice Callahan: 5.2%Boston Globe: 3.8%Appeal to Authority15.5%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.9%Alice Callahan: 6.0%Boston Globe: 2.8%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.1%Alice Callahan: 4.0%Boston Globe: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.1%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.3%Alice Callahan: 3.1%Boston Globe: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.3%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.4%Alice Callahan: 7.1%Boston Globe: 1.5%Unattributed Quote21.4%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.8%Alice Callahan: 2.3%Boston Globe: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice6.8%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alice Callahan: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Alice Callahan: 2.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.9%

322 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers39%attributed speech195writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Times • 19 words • 100.0% coverageTaylor Farms • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The New York Times

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words15% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.3 ptsWriter: 6.7%The New York Times: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%The New York Times: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.