Topic summary
28% 27 analyzed articles/videos 15,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Safety results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 5,290 hits . Analysis detected 55,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,780 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,458 of 15,448 topics). This Food Safety is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Food Safety
Topic details
Total words: 70,780
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score27 analyzed articles70.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst