Publication summary
54% 76 analyzed articles/videos 22,495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These dailydot.com results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 12,741 hits . Analysis detected 141,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 145,617 analyzed words across 76 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (211 of 379 publications). This dailydot.com is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. dailydot.com
Publication details
Total words: 145,617
Article count: 76
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score76 analyzed articles145.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst