Farmer Warns Shoppers About Chicken in Viral Grocery Store Message: “I Don’t Believe It’s a Healthy Food Anymore” 91%

By Jennifer55%

7/20/2026, 5:10:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 657 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,123 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

A woman is going viral online over the warning she’s giving regarding a popular food item purchased from the grocery store that’s probably sitting in the majority of people’s fridges or freezers  chicken. 
While she ended her video with a message urging viewers to avoid chicken, “If you’re going to stop buying one thing at the store, please let it be chicken,” the few minutes before she got to that warning offer context as to why she said it. 
This is wild. 
We have been lied to about everything 
We were told chicken is a health food, we’ve been told it’s what we should all be eating 
According to nutrient density information by multiple sources including the USDA, it ranks nearly dead last. 
Here’s the order for… pic.twitter.com/embm1ia6qX 
- Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) July 19, 2026 
Woman Says She No Longer Believes Chicken Is a “Healthy Food” 
In an under-three-minute clip reshared by X user @WallStreetApes, the woman, who appears to be a farmer based on the barn in the background, along with the goats and chicken coop featured in her video, starts by saying, “You know you’re deep down the rabbit hole when you no longer believe chicken is a healthy food, and I don’t believe it anymore.” 
She continues to explain that, “For decades we were sold this lie to sell chicken, that chicken is the cleanest source of protein… it is absolutely not true.” 
She then explains that “if you actually look at the nutrient density of proteins, beef is number one, lamb is number two, venison, bison, then you get to like fish and pig, and at the very, very bottom  chicken, lower than pig.” 
She says chicken ranks lower because chickens are “selectively bred” and that “all the nutrient density has been absolutely stripped from it.” 
She continues to allege that, “They’re not breeding these chickens to make them healthy. 
They’re breeding these chickens to grow bigger, grow faster, to eat less food, and to be more disease resistant.” 
She starts closing out her rant by saying that, “Nowhere in there does it say ‘and to have a higher nutritional content.’” 
Overall, the woman says the whole notion of pushing chicken as a healthy source of protein is “all a marketing sham.” 
But she still has more to share. 
The woman continues on to say that chickens are now bred to grow within six to eight weeks, and if they’re not processed within that time to go to market, they start to suffer as their legs begin to break and their hearts give out. 
Thank god people are getting wise to this. 
I have experimented on myself with everything from veganism to fruitarianism and I find that I feel my best eating grass fed beef, fish (especially sardines), eggs, cheese, butter, bacon, lamb, etc. 
I will eat fruit/berries for carbs and… 
- Bruce King (@BruceKingAI) July 20, 2026 
While the claims she makes require further research to determine whether they’re true, many people in the comments believe what she has to say. 
“Thank god people are getting wise to this. 
I have experimented on myself with everything from veganism to fruitarianism and I find that I feel my best eating grass fed beef, fish (especially sardines), eggs, cheese, butter, bacon, lamb, etc.,” one person shared. 
But another gave a much different suggestion, saying, “I don’t think we should be eating meat, we weren’t designed to eat it.” 
Regardless of the varying opinions shared in the comments, the woman does make some alarming claims that should be investigated. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post Farmer Warns Shoppers About Chicken in Viral Grocery Store Message: “I Don’t Believe It’s a Healthy Food Anymore” appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.3%Jennifer: 5.4%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias19.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Jennifer: 4.8%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 1.4%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.3%Jennifer: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias16.3%This article: 11.4%Jennifer: 4.5%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 1.2%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 11.0%Jennifer: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias11.0%This article: 7.9%Jennifer: 9.7%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias7.9%This article: 10.2%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 3.9%dailydot.com: 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 9.4%Jennifer: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.6%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect3.3%This article: 3.7%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 9.4%Jennifer: 0.9%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 1.7%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.2%Jennifer: 2.8%dailydot.com: 1.9%Appeal to Authority19.2%This article: 3.3%Jennifer: 2.8%dailydot.com: 2.2%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 3.3%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.4%Jennifer: 8.8%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization15.4%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.1%Jennifer: 3.0%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon6.1%This article: 31.2%Jennifer: 8.7%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion31.2%This article: 8.7%Jennifer: 1.0%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question8.7%This article: 13.1%Jennifer: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.4%Jennifer: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.9%Burden of Proof13.4%This article: 3.3%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 20.9%Jennifer: 6.1%dailydot.com: 7.4%Anecdotal20.9%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.3%Jennifer: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.1%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading2.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 45.8%Jennifer: 6.7%dailydot.com: 5.1%Unattributed Quote45.8%This article: 0.8%Jennifer: 3.7%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.8%This article: 16.1%Jennifer: 4.7%dailydot.com: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice16.1%This article: 11.0%Jennifer: 2.1%dailydot.com: 1.6%Indoctrination11.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Jennifer: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

657 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers5.0%attributed speech624writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWall Street Apes • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 62 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBruce King • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Dot • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daily Dot

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words55% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Daily Dot: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+91.3 ptsWriter: 8.7%Daily Dot: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-48.2 ptsWriter: 48.2%Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.0 ptsWriter: 17.0%Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Daily Dot: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.