Topic summary
⁠65%6 analyzed articles/videos2,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nutrition results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 2,220 hits. Analysis detected 20,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,003 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,729 of 15,753 topics). This Nutrition is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Nutrition
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,003
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos