Author summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 11,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa Hogenboom results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,612 hits . Analysis detected 37,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,646 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,590 of 6,184 authors). This Melissa Hogenboom is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Melissa Hogenboom
Author details
Total words: 58,646
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles58.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst