BBC0%

Want to improve your memory? The right type of exercise can give it a boost 64%

By Melissa Hogenboom0%

4/6/2026, 9:01:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 2,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 842 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.6% and a BS Rank of 64% (7,538 of 20,452 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the article peer group.

A brief bout of physical exercise can create "ripples" of activity in your brain that help you store and retrieve memories. 
Memory can be such a fickle thing. 
Whether trying to remember people's names, recall a list of items you need from the shop or preparing for an important exam or job interview, information that was in your head one minute can flutter out the next. 
But there's an easy way you can give your memory an instant boost when trying to learn new information  jump on an exercise bike for a few minutes or take a brisk walk. 
Research shows that we can improve our memory by doing aerobic exercise, or cardio. 
It's long been known that exercise boosts cognition  as I covered in my newsletter course Live Well for Longer. 
Physical activity improves how well we perform on tasks and strengthens brain areas vulnerable to ageing, potentially slowing down cognitive decline. 
But physical exercise can also strengthen an area of the brain important for memory  the hippocampus, which is why it can have a positive effect on our memory. 
Moderate exercise a few times a week for instance has been found to increase the size of the hippocampus. 
Other studies have shown that the timing of the exercise can make a difference too  going for a walk four hours after learning can improve memory retention and subsequent retrieval compared to exercising immediately afterwards. 
Stretching exercises, by comparison, did not provide any memory boost. 
Until now it's been difficult for scientists to understand the processes at play. 
One new research study aimed to do exactly that. 
Neuroscientists peered inside the heads of 14 people immediately after exercise and observed tiny bursts of electrical activity flowing between the brain cells, or neurons, that are known to be important for consolidating memories. 
These "brain ripples" are a phenomenon where many neurons activate together, says Michelle Voss, a neuroscientist at the University of Iowa who led the study. 
They play a key role in how the brain packages and stores memories during sleep and periods of quiet rest. 
(All those studied had drug resistant epilepsy, but the study looked at parts of the brain that were healthy and producing normal electrical signals.) 
The team monitored the brains of participants to see what would happen after a brief burst of activity. 
They found that after exercise, there was an increase in ripples in the hippocampus as well as other areas the hippocampus is connected to. 
Researchers believe this helps the brain consolidate memories. 
"These pulses were also more finely synchronised with neural activity in the rest of the brain," Voss says. 
Her team collaborated with neurosurgeons who monitor electrical activity in patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. 
These patients temporarily had electrodes implanted in their brains, meaning the team was able to observe the electrical activity before and after exercising on an exercise bike. 
Though the participants did not do any learning as part of the study, previous studies had indicated that "ripples" could be a candidate for cementing memories. 
"That presents us with a unique opportunity to understand how the human brain works with direct measurements of electrical signalling, which is the primary currency of how the brain works," Voss says. 
These ripples occur too quickly to be picked up by standard brain scans, making this study the first to show how exercise influences the brain's electrical activity directly. 
This synchrony, she believes, may provide a biological explanation for why people often remember information better if they exercise shortly after learning it. 
And it only took a brief burst of activity to increase brain ripples  showing that even short bursts of activities could benefit our memory. 
Voss hopes the work helps reframe public health messaging around physical activity and could help us think about ageing better too, especially as strengthening the areas important for memory could help protect the brain from cognitive decline. 
At the same time, we know that regular bursts of activity provide us a range of other brain and body benefits too. 
Research shows that a single workout can improve focus for up to two hours afterwards, as well as immediately boost levels of the "feel-good" hormone dopamine. 
Another recent study found that the more we exercise and the fitter we become, the more benefit our brain gets from after a single workout. 
Any physical activity is clearly beneficial, but this new study revealed that the brain benefits increase the more active we are. 
This happens because higher cardiovascular fitness and muscle mass enable the body to produce more of a protein vital for forming new brain connections, called Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). 
"There's a reason to stay active because you will benefit more every time," says Flaminia Ronca, an exercise physiology researcher at University College London in the UK, who led the study. 
"If you stick with exercise for six weeks, you will reap bigger benefits from any further sessions." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 4.6%BBC: 3.0%Confirmation Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.7%BBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 4.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.4%BBC: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.4%BBC: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias9.5%This article: 4.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 3.0%BBC: 4.7%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.4%BBC: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.5%BBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 4.3%BBC: 3.6%Optimism Bias22.7%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.6%BBC: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.4%BBC: 4.4%Negativity Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.8%BBC: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.4%BBC: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.9%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.7%BBC: 4.6%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.7%BBC: 1.1%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 4.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 2.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 7.9%BBC: 5.5%Appeal to Authority30.6%This article: 3.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 1.1%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 4.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope4.4%This article: 3.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.4%This article: 27.8%Melissa Hogenboom: 5.9%BBC: 5.5%Hasty Generalization27.8%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 3.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.5%Begging the Question3.4%This article: 44.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 5.5%BBC: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)44.4%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.1%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof3.1%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.6%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.2%BBC: 3.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.8%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.8%BBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.8%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.6%BBC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote30.5%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 42.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.1%BBC: 5.8%Biased Writer Voice42.9%This article: 10.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 3.6%BBC: 1.4%Indoctrination10.5%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.6%BBC: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.4%

842 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers19%attributed speech682writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Voss • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Voss • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Voss • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Voss • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageFlaminia Ronca • 31 words • 0.0% coverageFlaminia Ronca • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michelle Voss

100%flagged-word coverage
112 attributed words70% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.7 ptsWriter: 48.2%Michelle Voss: 28.6%28.6%Unattributed Quote-37.7 ptsWriter: 37.7%Michelle Voss: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+28.1 ptsWriter: 5.0%Michelle Voss: 33.0%33.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Michelle Voss: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.