Keyword summary
49% 10 analyzed articles/videos 13,882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neuroscience results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 4,488 hits . Analysis detected 42,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,004 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,856 of 35,112 keywords). This Neuroscience is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Neuroscience
Keyword details
Total words: 53,004
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles53K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst