Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Geggel results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,675 hits . Analysis detected 4,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,293 of 6,196 authors). This Laura Geggel is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Laura Geggel
Author details
Total words: 7,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 21.7% 21.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 21.7%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst