Publication summary
7% 69 analyzed articles/videos 44,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Live Science results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 10,685 hits . Analysis detected 145,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 253,629 analyzed words across 69 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (359 of 379 publications). This Live Science is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 253,629
Article count: 69
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score69 analyzed articles253.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst