Author summary
3%2 analyzed articles/videos1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mindy Weisberger results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,434 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,954 of 6,348 authors). This Mindy Weisberger is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Mindy Weisberger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
7%Mindy Weisberger (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,434
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751006.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Special Pleading: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate