Author summary
15%4 analyzed articles/videos4,743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenna Hughes-Castleberry results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,096 hits. Analysis detected 9,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,815 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,510 of 6,366 authors). This Kenna Hughes-Castleberry is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Kenna Hughes-Castleberry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
14%Kenna Hughes-Castleberry (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,815
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate