Author summary
43%1 analyzed article/video897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isha Ishtiaq results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,691 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,343 of 6,215 authors). This Isha Ishtiaq is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Isha Ishtiaq
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Isha Ishtiaq (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,691
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos