Author summary
77%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Lahey results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 2,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,178 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,144 of 6,628 authors). This Susan Lahey is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Susan Lahey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
68%Susan Lahey (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,178
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos