Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Robson results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 1,986 hits . Analysis detected 22,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,260 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,367 of 6,135 authors). This David Robson is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. David Robson
Author details
Total words: 33,260
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles33.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst