Author summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corinne Purtill results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,746 hits. Analysis detected 14,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,029 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (3,815 of 6,359 authors). This Corinne Purtill is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Corinne Purtill
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠40%Corinne Purtill (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,029
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos