Topic summary
â 44% 164 analyzed articles/videos 114,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 39,148 hits . Analysis detected 426,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 581,161 analyzed words across 162 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 5% (15,081 of 15,769 topics). This Health is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Health
Topic details
Total words: 581,161
Article count: 162
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score162 analyzed articles581.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst