Author summary
â 78% 1 analyzed article/video 702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Capital-Star results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 1,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of â 66% (2,194 of 6,360 authors). This Pennsylvania Capital-Star is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Pennsylvania Capital-Star
Author details
Total words: 2,106
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.3% 7.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst