Publication summary
42%6 analyzed articles/videos2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Post and Courier results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,002 hits. Analysis detected 6,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,608 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (327 of 379 publications). This Post and Courier is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Post and Courier
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
14%Post and Courier (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate