Author summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos1,978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mindy Lucas results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 754 hits. Analysis detected 3,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (5,928 of 6,629 authors). This Mindy Lucas is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Mindy Lucas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠11%Mindy Lucas (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,383
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos