Author summary
⁠26%3 analyzed articles/videos2,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Courier results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 2,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,033 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (5,156 of 6,612 authors). This Courier is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Courier
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠22%Courier (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,033
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos