Author summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 1,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ph.D. Special to The Post results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 1,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,405 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,597 of 6,628 authors). This Ph.D. Special to The Post is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Ph.D. Special to The Post
Author details
Total words: 3,405
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst