Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ed Cara results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,098 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,602 authors). This Ed Cara is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ed Cara
Author details
Total words: 1,098
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.1% 13.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.5% 12.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst