Author summary
⁠28%4 analyzed articles/videos1,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ingold results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 918 hits. Analysis detected 6,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,302 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (4,463 of 6,612 authors). This John Ingold is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
John Ingold
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠33%John Ingold (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,302
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos