Topic summary
52% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fitness results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 4,344 hits . Analysis detected 37,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,919 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,336 of 15,689 topics). This Fitness is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Fitness
Topic details
Total words: 46,919
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score10 analyzed articles46.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst