NPR84%

We can't all be astronauts, but the Artemis II crew has fitness lessons for everyone 43%

By Katia Riddle0%

4/9/2026, 5:41:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 794 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,566 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the article peer group.

Even a few days away from Earth can significantly alter the human body. 
Without the constant pull of gravity on the skeleton, muscle and bone can quickly atrophy. 
To combat this immediate physical decline, the four astronauts aboard Orion on the Artemis II mission are using a specially designed machine known as the flywheel. 
In a video blog posted before the crew launched, Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen compares the flywheel to a rowing machine. 
"Like a cardiovascular workout where you row at a lower resistance and a fast pace," Hansen explains as he demonstrates the flywheel's functionality. 
Astronauts strap their feet onto a small platform and pull on a handle connected to a cable. 
Pulling spins a flywheel. 
It works like a yo-yo, according to NASA  astronauts get as much resistance as they put into it. 
The flywheel is small, not unlike an extra large shoebox. 
Working in Orion's tight quarters  only 316 cubic feet, about the size of a smallish bedroom  engineers had to design this device to perform with utmost efficiency, so that it can both provide a cardiovascular workout and resistance exercises up to 400 pounds. 
Astronauts can use it to do weightlifting moves like squats, deadlifts and curls. 
Before the astronauts, there were the pillownauts 
The flywheel has been years in the making. 
Jessica Scott, an exercise physiologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, worked on early prototypes for NASA, anticipating that astronauts would be vulnerable to rapid muscle atrophy without physical exertion. 
Scott compares ten days in space to ten days in bed. 
Atrophying for that amount of time, says Scott, "You would feel very weak and your muscles start to lose size very quickly." 
The heart, she stresses, is especially vulnerable with this decline in strength. 
When recruiting people to study these early flywheel prototypes, says Scott, researchers looked for 30 subjects willing to lie in bed for 70 days. 
She and her colleagues weren't sure they would be easy to recruit. 
Turns out, people were eager to spend hours a day reclining in the name of science. 
"We had over 10,000 people apply for 30 positions," says Scott. 
They called themselves the "pillownauts." 
Researchers divided these participants into different groups. 
Some stayed in bed all day. 
Some of them broke their bed rest in order to work out on a more traditional suite of exercise equipment, and some of them used the flywheel. 
The goal was not to improve fitness, but to prevent declines. 
The flywheel, says Scott, delivered the results researchers were hoping. 
"What was really exciting was that the small device could prevent the declines, the same amount that a full gym could do," she says. 
Other missions  like those aboard the International Space Station  have full suites of exercise equipment. 
The flywheel has not yet been tested for longer durations, but Scott says she's hopeful it could also provide fitness for astronauts in longer periods of gravity deprivation. 
Not everyone's an astronaut, but everyone ages 
Even for people who are not planning on orbiting the moon  this research has important implications, says Thomas Lang, a radiologist who studies bone and muscle loss and has worked with NASA on exercise science for previous missions. 
"You start childhood and then as you grow your bone density and mass reach a peak," says Lang, "in your late twenties or early thirties." 
Those who are lucky to live to old age, he says, will experience hormonal changes that lead to bone loss over time. 
For women, that escalates sharply in menopause. 
"That's a big whopping decline," says Lang. 
Men's decline may not be as dramatic, says Lang, but they are also vulnerable, especially as they live into their 70s and 80s. 
NASA researcher Jessica Scott is also hopeful this work could have broader applications for the general public. 
Few of us will travel to space, but many of us can relate to dealing with time and space constraints when it comes to exercise, says Scott. 
"One day we could all be having our own flywheel," she says  something small enough to fit under a desk at work, or in the corner of an office. 
After his first 30-minute aerobic session with the device, astronaut Reid Wiseman said he was happy to report that in addition to providing a good workout, he was pleased the flywheel didn't drive his roommates too crazy. 
No one had to wear ear plugs to block out the sound. 
" It is a really good piece of gear and we can actually get a nice workout," says Wiseman. 
"I look forward to the next time I get to try a resistance workout." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Katia Riddle: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Katia Riddle: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 3.5%Katia Riddle: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Katia Riddle: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Katia Riddle: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.0%This article: 18.9%Katia Riddle: 13.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias18.9%This article: 1.5%Katia Riddle: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias1.5%This article: 9.3%Katia Riddle: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias9.3%This article: 5.9%Katia Riddle: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Katia Riddle: 3.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Katia Riddle: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 0.9%Katia Riddle: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.2%Katia Riddle: 8.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority22.2%This article: 4.3%Katia Riddle: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 7.3%Katia Riddle: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope7.3%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%Katia Riddle: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.7%Katia Riddle: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 1.4%Katia Riddle: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 1.9%Katia Riddle: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.9%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Katia Riddle: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Katia Riddle: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 12.3%Katia Riddle: 8.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.6%Katia Riddle: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.6%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.3%Katia Riddle: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.3%This article: 2.5%Katia Riddle: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katia Riddle: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Katia Riddle: 3.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

794 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers65%attributed speech281writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Hansen • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJeremy Hansen • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 39 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 25 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 22 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Lang • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 30 words • 100.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 19 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wiseman • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Reid Wiseman

100%flagged-word coverage
70 attributed words14% of attributed speech78% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.