‘You can see God’s hand in it’: How Milwaukee women are building a double Dutch community through sisterhood and fitness 48%

By Chesnie Wardell0% Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service33%

7/17/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,169 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,436 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the article peer group.

On Milwaukee’s North Side, women 40 and up are coming together to jump double Dutch. 
Members say that beyond the ropes they are building a sisterhood, strengthening their health and becoming confident in aging. 
40+ Double Dutch Club is a nonprofit founded in Chicago by Pamela Robinson in 2016 that uses double Dutch and other fitness activities to encourage wellness, sisterhood, mental health and more for women over 40. 
“It amazes me how God can use something as simple as a plastic clothesline to connect women all over the world,” said Robinson, who is also the group’s CEO and board president. 
Robinson, 55, launched the organization after discussing the idea with her friend Catrina Dyer-Taylor. 
At the time she was battling depression. 
“My husband and I were about to get divorced, my oldest kids were grown and I just had my youngest one in the house,” Robinson said. 
“I needed to find a happy place.” 
She promoted the meetup on social media, and many of her friends and community members came out to support her. 
“I remember telling (Dyer-Taylor) that if no one came then we’d tie the ropes to a fence and jump together,” Robinson said. 
“However, we never had to do that because our friends came out.” 
Since being founded, the organization has expanded into hundreds of subclubs nationwide, including Milwaukee’s. 
“I knew that God wanted me to do something and it’s given me purpose and he has put me on a path where 40+ Double Dutch is a part of that,” said Angela Scott, captain and founder of Milwaukee’s double Dutch subclub. 
Launching the Milwaukee subclub 
Scott, 54, established the 40+ Double Dutch subclub in Milwaukee in 2024 after discovering the organization on Facebook. 
She took weekend trips to Chicago and sometimes Texas to participate with women of the club. 
“The feeling I got from the ladies when I entered the gym was like I’ve known them all my life,” Scott said. 
As a breast cancer survivor, Scott said she was glad to have found something that brought her comfort that wasn’t a traditional gym space. 
“Double Dutching is a full body workout, and I don’t like the gym, but I knew I needed something to keep my body moving and to keep cancer out of my body,” Scott said. 
Once officially joining 40+ Double Dutch, Scott talked to Robinson about bringing a subclub to Milwaukee. 
“She said that they had been wanting one in Milwaukee, they just had no one that was interested and committed,” Scott said. 
Milwaukee’s subclub now consists of 37 members. 
Among them is Scott’s mother, Shirley Tomlinson, 76, who is the first and oldest member. 
“I feel like my family has grown here and that’s a very positive thing for a person my age,” Tomlinson said. 
“It helps keep me feeling young, and there’s a lot of support in it.” 
Tomlinson said she joined the club after hearing about her daughter’s Chicago experience and watching the film “Beyond the Ropes: The 40+ Double Dutch Club Documentary.“ 
Though Tomlinson doesn’t jump double Dutch, she does other things for the subclub like record keeping, videography, planning birthday celebrations and more. 
“I do everything I can because I’m my daughter’s ride or die,” she said. 
Reliving childhood memories 
Scott said double Dutch gives her a joyous nostalgia from growing up, especially as she learned how to double Dutch from her aunt who was like a big sister. 
“If you were a girl that jump-roped, then you know it takes you back to that space,” Scott said. 
When the Milwaukee subclub appears at local events like the Juneteenth parade, residents typically will jump in the ropes with smiles and recall memories as they walk down the streets. 
“As you watch us grow, you can see God’s hand in it,” Tomlinson said. 
The women of Milwaukee’s subclub meet from 6:30 to 8 p.m. every Wednesday at Abundant Faith Church of Integrity, 7830 W. 
Good Hope Road. 
The meet typically begins with a stretch, then leads to open play that includes dances and songs to let them double Dutch, hula hoop or play a rhythmic game. 
One fitness activity recreated by 40+ Double Dutch is African Hopscotch, which includes members jumping to a song called “Double Dutch Bus” by Frankie Smith and sometimes holding pompoms. 
To end the session, members close with a double Dutch hymn followed by a circle of prayer. 
“We hold hands and then we sing the song,” Scott said. 
“Regardless of what meet you go to each one will have the same format.” 
Building a strong sisterhood 
Scott said the relationships being built at the club remind her of the organization’s mission. 
“Part of the mission is friendship, fitness, fun and fellowship,” she said. 
“All of those things resonate with me and in my spirit because it’s a sisterhood that’s based on God’s direction.” 
When away from the ropes, members try to support each other in different ways. 
“There are several of the ladies in our club that have businesses, and we’ll do anything to support them,” Scott said. 
For Tomlinson, who experienced a few health crises this year, it brought relief knowing that there was a sisterhood standing behind her. 
“They reached out to me and let me know they were praying for me,” she said. 
“It’s like having a big family of daughters.” 
Achieving long-term goals 
Within the next few years, Scott hopes to see the subclub grow in membership and the women begin to intentionally take more time for themselves. 
“I truly believe that a healthy and strong woman makes a healthy and strong world because we are the mothers of this world,” she said. 
“If the woman is not healthy mentally, physically or spiritually, then the world is not healthy.” 
Another goal of hers is to visit with incarcerated women. 
“For whatever reason that they’re there, I just want to take them out of that space for just 30 to 40 minutes,” she said. 
Tomlinson said it amazes her to see her daughter lead, receive support from the community and promote health to other women. 
“It’s been wonderful watching her grow and watching how dedicated she is because that’s a big responsibility,” she said. 
How to join 40+ Double Dutch Club 
If you are a woman over 40 and interested in joining, click here to find a subclub near you and find details about weekly meetups. 
Membership is $120 and includes a digital ID card, access to all nationwide subclubs, subclub support and more. 
Scott said the summer has been the busiest time for the organization and wants to remind women that you don’t have to jump to be a part of it. 
“People are starting to realize we’re in the city and we like it that way because the more women that know then the more that can be impacted by what we have to offer,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.7%Chesnie Wardell: 8.5%Wisconsin Watch: 2.1%Confirmation Bias10.7%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Chesnie Wardell: 4.2%Wisconsin Watch: 2.2%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 2.5%Chesnie Wardell: 1.4%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 1.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Hindsight Bias1.0%This article: 3.3%Chesnie Wardell: 2.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 2.5%Chesnie Wardell: 0.8%Wisconsin Watch: 3.8%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Chesnie Wardell: 0.5%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.4%This article: 10.4%Chesnie Wardell: 6.2%Wisconsin Watch: 2.5%Optimism Bias10.4%This article: 1.4%Chesnie Wardell: 0.5%Wisconsin Watch: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 5.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Chesnie Wardell: 2.4%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 1.9%Chesnie Wardell: 0.6%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.9%This article: 1.9%Chesnie Wardell: 0.6%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias1.9%This article: 3.4%Chesnie Wardell: 3.7%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Chesnie Wardell: 4.3%Wisconsin Watch: 1.6%Halo Effect8.6%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Chesnie Wardell: 2.3%Wisconsin Watch: 3.1%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 1.4%Chesnie Wardell: 0.9%Wisconsin Watch: 1.2%False Dilemma1.4%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.6%Chesnie Wardell: 1.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.6%This article: 13.6%Chesnie Wardell: 6.5%Wisconsin Watch: 2.3%Hasty Generalization13.6%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Chesnie Wardell: 3.9%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 10.4%Chesnie Wardell: 3.5%Wisconsin Watch: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion10.4%This article: 5.0%Chesnie Wardell: 1.7%Wisconsin Watch: 0.5%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 6.4%Chesnie Wardell: 4.5%Wisconsin Watch: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.6%Chesnie Wardell: 1.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Appeal to Nature3.6%This article: 3.5%Chesnie Wardell: 1.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Composition/Division3.5%This article: 15.7%Chesnie Wardell: 6.2%Wisconsin Watch: 2.8%Anecdotal15.7%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Chesnie Wardell: 0.8%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Middle Ground2.5%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.6%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.7%Chesnie Wardell: 1.7%Wisconsin Watch: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 1.7%Chesnie Wardell: 0.6%Wisconsin Watch: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice1.7%This article: 10.7%Chesnie Wardell: 4.7%Wisconsin Watch: 1.6%Indoctrination10.7%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chesnie Wardell: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Chesnie Wardell: 9.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.2%

1169 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers59%attributed speech477writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coveragePamela Robinson • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePamela Robinson • 26 words • 0.0% coveragePamela Robinson • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePamela Robinson • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePamela Robinson • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 14 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageAngela Scott • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 16 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAngela Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageShirley Tomlinson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAngela Scott • 29 words • 100.0% coverageAngela Scott • 36 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Angela Scott

89%flagged-word coverage
440 attributed words64% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +5.8 ptsWriter: 9.0%Angela Scott: 14.8%14.8%Indoctrination+10.5 ptsWriter: 3.6%Angela Scott: 14.1%14.1%Quote-first Misdirection-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Angela Scott: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Angela Scott: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.