Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sisterhood results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 3,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,507 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sisterhood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sisterhood
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Sisterhood (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,507
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos