Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mercey Livingston results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 3,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,153 of 6,362 authors). This Mercey Livingston is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Mercey Livingston
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
35%Mercey Livingston (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,868
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos