Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Igo results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 3,512 hits . Analysis detected 17,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,914 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,864 of 6,628 authors). This Caroline Igo is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Caroline Igo
Author details
Total words: 25,914
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles25.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst