BBC0%

Why moving about is key for children's health - and happiness 24%

By Melissa Hogenboom0%

5/25/2026, 9:00:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,294 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.7% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,169 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the article peer group.

Children are less physically active than they used to be. 
Scientists are now finding practical and effective ways to encourage children to move more. 
It could have lasting benefits on their health. 
Globally children are less active than they used to be. 
That could end up having lasting effects on their health, scientists say. 
This inactivity comes amid rising obesity rates, with one in 10 children and adolescents living with the condition. 
Increased sedentary time, stress, the quality of food and lower levels of sports participation have all contributed. 
The good news is that understanding what makes children less active also presents opportunities to encourage them to move more, which will benefit them now and in the future. 
In fact, growing evidence now suggests there are practical and effective ways to do so, boosting their physical and cognitive health in the process. 
Children should have 60 minutes of physical activity per day according to recommendations. 
Many do not meet them. 
This can have lasting effects, as physical inactivity in childhood is linked to less activity in adulthood. 
Children that are more physically active are also more likely to be active as adults. 
One longitudinal study following 712 World War Two veterans for 50 years found that participation in sports at high school was the strongest predictor for better health outcomes at 70, as well as being more physically active in older years. 
Those who played sports also had fewer visits to the doctor. 
Numerous studies show similar effects. 
Exercise in childhood is linked to better long-term health too. 
Those who take part in youth sports have been shown to have a lower body mass index (BMI), smaller waist circumference and better mental health as well as better educational achievements and cognitive performance. 
Cognitive benefits 
Physical exercise benefits children in the moment too, says Nicole Logan an assistant professor of kinesiology from the University of Rhode Island in the US. 
"It improves body composition but also improves and maintains positive cognitive functions as children develop through adolescence," she says. 
"If we do more physical activity, we increase our cardiorespiratory fitness and that is good for our brain as well." 
Given these benefits, there's an increasing focus among researchers on helping children and adolescents sit less and move more, according to groups like the World Health Organization (WHO). 
For instance, in one nine-month after-school exercise programme, Logan and colleagues found that children with obesity had better cognitive scores than those who were not part of the intervention. 
The activities took place after school and included moderate to vigorous activities five days per week. 
This intervention was found to reduce body fat too, which is one reason cognition improved, Logan explains. 
That's because fat stored around our vital organs can produce inflammation  which in turn is linked to poorer cognitive function, whilst aerobic fitness and physical activity shas been linked to better accuracy on complex tasks, better reaction times. and improved inhibitory control, which helps children resist impulsive reactions and is therefore key to concentration. 
Logan proposes that schools should implement 60 minutes of movement per day, which would remove the burden on parents to facilitate access to sports (which can be expensive and time consuming). 
Stopping stillness 
Increasing physical activity doesn't need to involve structured sports either. 
In a study in Massachusetts in the US, simply increasing the opportunities around physical activity before, during and after school, as well as giving children better access to healthy food, resulted in lower BMIs among elementary school children. 
About one quarter of these children had not taken part in any sports in the year prior to the study. 
"The most effective way to actually help prevent obesity among children is to improve the food environment around children, promote physical activity and have rules around screen time," says Ulla Toft, a clinical professor in the department of health at the University of Copenhagen who is undertaking a large-scale obesity intervention study in Denmark focusing on four key areas: diet, physical activity, screen use and sleep. 
School-based interventions have shown promise too. 
One recent study which encouraged teachers to reduce sedentary time in 30 UK schools found 8% decline in waist-to-hip ratio (a measure of abdominal fat) among the children who took part, as well as a 10% increase in sports participation. 
In the study, teachers were encouraged to ask children to stand when answering questions and to move around the classroom more than usual. 
"It wasn't about exercise, but about sitting down less," says Flaminia Ronca, from the University College London's Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health and lead author of the study. 
As children sit for large parts of the school day, implementing creative ways of adding movement could improve health, she says. 
Parental support 
It's unclear if this type of intervention will have long-term effects, but Ronca says fostering healthy behaviours early could have lasting benefits. 
In line with other studies, Ronca's study also suggests that the more active children were, the faster they reacted on cognitive tasks involving attention and inhibitory control. 
Follow up research found that a single 30-minute physical activity session also improved children's performance on a cognitive task. 
Given that physical activity often decreases among adolescents, especially for girls, parental support can also increase participation. 
In one US survey of both children and their parents, girls whose parents encouraged them and helped them find opportunities to participate in sports, were more likely to persist. 
Similarly, as children often learn from the adults around them, research has shown that children are more likely to be physically active if their parents are active too  as well as if parents exercise with their children. 
This could be as simple as a bike ride in the local park or a short jog together. 
Increased confidence 
Another way to increase physical activity is to consider how children feel when they are moving. 
Michaela James from Swansea University's medical school in the UK has found that when children feel confident and competent around movement, it increases their wellbeing. 
She has found that many schools focus heavily on structured physical activities, which can leave some children to feel excluded and can affect their confidence. 
More like this: 
 The benefits of five minutes' exercise per day 
 The surprising benefits of standing on one leg 
 What to do now to stay healthy into your 70s 
Giving children more choice over what activities they do could be life-changing she says. 
"It could be quite chaotic to hand over power to young people and say, 'just go with it' but I think that plays a massive part in raising kind and compassionate humans." 
Increasing unstructured play should be simple to enact too, by encouraging active movement breaks and ensuring that break times are not removed as punishment, which has been used by some schools as a behavioural intervention. 
In line with this, designing playgrounds more creatively to encourage free play, using objects like crates, tyres or wooden pallets could help increase activity levels too. 
And crucially, we need to recognise that all movement is valuable, say James, whether climbing a tree, running around a playground or playing tag. 
"It's all about valuing what children want to be able to do," she says. 
* Melissa Hogenboom is a senior health correspondent at the BBC and author of Breadwinners (2025) and The Motherhood Complex. 
She is melissa_hogenboom on Instagram. 
-- 
For trusted insights on health and wellbeing, sign up to the Health Fix newsletter by senior health correspondent Melissa Hogenboom who also writes the Live Well For Longer and Six Steps to Calm courses. 
For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 4.6%BBC: 3.0%Confirmation Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.7%BBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 5.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.4%BBC: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.4%BBC: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias15.3%This article: 8.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 3.0%BBC: 4.7%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 2.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.4%BBC: 0.3%Loss Aversion2.4%This article: 2.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.5%BBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Melissa Hogenboom: 4.3%BBC: 3.6%Optimism Bias13.8%This article: 2.6%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.6%BBC: 0.9%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 6.8%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.4%BBC: 4.4%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.8%BBC: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.4%BBC: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.7%BBC: 4.6%Halo Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.7%BBC: 1.1%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 7.9%BBC: 5.5%Appeal to Authority22.5%This article: 2.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 1.1%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 2.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 1.5%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.5%This article: 19.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 5.9%BBC: 5.5%Hasty Generalization19.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.2%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.7%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 8.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.2%BBC: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 3.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.5%Begging the Question3.3%This article: 37.2%Melissa Hogenboom: 5.5%BBC: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)37.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.6%Appeal to Nature1.4%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.2%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.2%BBC: 3.5%Anecdotal4.2%This article: 1.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.9%This article: 3.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.8%BBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Middle Ground1.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.7%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Special Pleading2.7%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 1.6%BBC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote20.9%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.3%BBC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.3%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.1%BBC: 5.8%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 9.4%Melissa Hogenboom: 3.6%BBC: 1.4%Indoctrination9.4%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Hogenboom: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Melissa Hogenboom: 2.6%BBC: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.9%

1294 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech891writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Logan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Logan • 19 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Logan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Logan • 17 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Logan • 55 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Logan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageUlla Toft • 66 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFlaminia Ronca • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFlaminia Ronca • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMichaela James • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichaela James • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMichaela James • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMichaela James • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMichaela James • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ulla Toft

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words16% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ulla Toft: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+81.1 ptsWriter: 18.9%Ulla Toft: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Ulla Toft: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.