Keyword summary
45% 17 analyzed articles/videos 10,699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obesity results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 3,272 hits . Analysis detected 38,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,874 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,510 of 37,538 keywords). This Obesity is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Obesity
Keyword details
Total words: 60,874
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score17 analyzed articles60.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst