Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Randolph results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 621 hits . Analysis detected 6,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,856 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,660 of 6,628 authors). This Mary Randolph is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Mary Randolph
Author details
Total words: 10,856
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst