BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,779 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.
An ancient human ancestor called Homo floresiensis was likely a scavenger who subsisted on the scraps left behind by the fearsome Komodo dragons that shared their home on the island of Flores in Indonesia.
That’s the key takeaway from a new study that challenges previous evidence that suggested these ancient hominins, nicknamed “hobbits” in a nod to the J.R.R.
Tolkien creatures, could hunt large prey and start fires.
When scientists first discovered H. floresiensis fossils on Flores, one of the islands that make up Indonesia, two decades ago, they speculated that the short, small-brained hominins may have been closely related to another ancient human, Homo erectus.
This was supported by the bones of an apparently murdered Stegodon, an extinct species of elephant, and burnt remains in the cave where the hobbit fossils were found—leading scientists to believe they were able to hunt and used fire.
But the new study, publishede today in Science Advances, claims that hobbits did neither of those things.
Instead the authors claim that Komodo dragons actually ate the Stegodon, and the hobbits scavenged on the reptiles’ leftovers.
To prove this, they fed goat carcasses to Komodo dragons at a zoo and compared the bite marks on those bones to marks found on the bones of the Stegodon.
This method of taphonomy—the technical term for the study of what happens to organisms after death—offers a “smoking gun of who did what,” says Briana Pobiner, a paleoanthropologist at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History and a co-author on the study.
“It’s a great example, in many ways, of going back to study a fossil assemblage that hadn’t been studied with these taphonomic methods in more detail,” she says.
“The more we do this, the more we’re able to answer or clarify or overturn some ideas that have been out there for a while.”
The researchers also studied roughly 4,500 rodent bones found in the cave and discovered no burns or evidence of fire.
The burnt bones that had been discovered alongside the hobbits, the authors argue, were likely the result of Homo sapiens using the cave at a later date.
Dean Falk, an anthropology professor at Florida State University who was not involved in the research, says the paper is making a “dramatic claim” about assumptions widely shared among scholars since the discovery of the species.
The ability of H. florensiensis to hunt and create fire, Falk says, is “what has remained after these 20-some years, and this paper is coming out and saying, ‘Wait a minute.
Hold on.’
”
Falk notes that the study doesn’t answer every outstanding question about the hobbits, including whether these ancient humans could have hunted Stegodon without cutting through to the bone.
“It’s really interesting, and it will generate more research,” Falk says.
Although Homo floresiensis is an ancient species of human, it isn’t entirely clear how it relates to our own species, H. sapiens, or to other extinct kinds of humans, such as Neanderthals.
What we do know is that in different parts of the world, these species existed at the same time, Pobiner says.
H. florensiensis appears to have died out on Flores some 50,000 years ago after the arrival of modern humans on the island; at that time, Neanderthals and H. sapiens lived alongside each other in Europe and Asia.
(Neanderthals are thought to have gone extinct some 10,000 years later.)
The possibility that Homo floresiensis evolved differently and survived without some of the key behavioral abilities of modern humans offers a new perspective on the human family and our own origins, Pobiner adds.
“There are long-standing misunderstandings about human evolution as being all progressive and that behavioral evolution was linear,” Pobiner says.
“This is a good example that our family tree was not a straight line.”
Speakers
2speakers46%attributed speech345writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageBriana Pobiner
182 attributed words63% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.