Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Watts results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 1,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,669 of 6,359 authors). This Erika Watts is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Erika Watts
Author details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst