Author summary
66%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Archote results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,634 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,014 of 6,628 authors). This Josh Archote is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Josh Archote
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Josh Archote (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,634
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos