Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 8,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Morales-Brown results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 3,027 hits . Analysis detected 21,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,485 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (6,079 of 6,487 authors). This Peter Morales-Brown is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Peter Morales-Brown
Author details
Total words: 37,485
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles37.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst