Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrienne Gil results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,207 of 6,628 authors). This Adrienne Gil is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Adrienne Gil
Author details
Total words: 2,948
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst